| 000 | 02444nab a2200265 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | AR-ReUNN | ||
| 005 | 20260702004756.0 | ||
| 008 | 260701s2023 ag |||||||||||||||||spa | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aElnaghy, Amr M. _9199472 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aMandorah, Ayman _9199473 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aElsaka, Shaymaa _9199474 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aEffectiveness of XP-endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and File agitation on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a comparative study |
| 264 | 1 | _c2023 | |
| 300 | _a6 páginas | ||
| 520 | _aThe purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of the XP-endo Finisher (FKG Dentaire SA, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) file on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals in comparison to different irrigation regimens. Seventy-five freshly extracted human mandibular molar teeth with mesial root curved more than 20° were used in this study. The mesial root canals were mechanically prepared using the BT-Race rotary system (FKG Dentaire) and divided into five groups (n = 15) according to the following irrigation techniques: positive control, non-agitated, File agitation, XP-endo Finisher, and EndoActivator (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialities, Tulsa, OK, USA). Root canals were split longitudinally and evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Five-grade scoring system was used to assess the presence of debris and smear layer at the coronal, middle, and apical regions. The XP-endo Finisher and EndoActivator groups revealed significantly lower debris and smear layer scores than the other groups at the coronal, middle, and apical regions (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between XP-endo Finisher and EndoActivator groups (P > 0.05). The apical region had higher debris and smear layer scores compared with the coronal regions in all groups (P < 0.05), except for the positive control group; there was no significant difference between the three regions of the root canal (P > 0.05). Irrigation of curved root canals using XP-endo Finisher and EndoActivator methods appears to be more effective on debris and smear layer removal than the other tested groups. | ||
| 650 | 4 |
_aConductos Radiculares Curvos _9170610 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aEscombros _929847 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aCapa de Frotis _9199471 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aAcabadora Xp-Endo _9199475 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aEndoactivador _9199476 |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_tOdontology _x1618-1247 _gv. 105 n. 2 (2017) _w257190 |
|
| 942 | _cART | ||
| 035 | _a(ODN)65694 | ||
| 001 | 266533 | ||
| 999 |
_c266533 _d266533 |
||
| 040 |
_aAR-ReUNN _bspa _cAR-ReUNN _eaacr2 |
||