<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02444nab a2200265 a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">AR-ReUNN</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260702004756.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260701s2023    ag |||||||||||||||||spa  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Elnaghy, Amr M.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">199472</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Mandorah, Ayman</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">199473</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Elsaka, Shaymaa</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">199474</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and File agitation on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a comparative study</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
    <subfield code="c">2023</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">6 p&#xE1;ginas</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of the XP-endo Finisher (FKG Dentaire SA, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) file on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals in comparison to different irrigation regimens. Seventy-five freshly extracted human mandibular molar teeth with mesial root curved more than 20&#xB0; were used in this study. The mesial root canals were mechanically prepared using the BT-Race rotary system (FKG Dentaire) and divided into five groups (n = 15) according to the following irrigation techniques: positive control, non-agitated, File agitation, XP-endo Finisher, and EndoActivator (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialities, Tulsa, OK, USA). Root canals were split longitudinally and evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Five-grade scoring system was used to assess the presence of debris and smear layer at the coronal, middle, and apical regions. The XP-endo Finisher and EndoActivator groups revealed significantly lower debris and smear layer scores than the other groups at the coronal, middle, and apical regions (P &lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference between XP-endo Finisher and EndoActivator groups (P &gt; 0.05). The apical region had higher debris and smear layer scores compared with the coronal regions in all groups (P &lt; 0.05), except for the positive control group; there was no significant difference between the three regions of the root canal (P &gt; 0.05). Irrigation of curved root canals using XP-endo Finisher and EndoActivator methods appears to be more effective on debris and smear layer removal than the other tested groups.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">Conductos Radiculares Curvos</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">170610</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">Escombros</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">29847</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">Capa de Frotis</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">199471</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">Acabadora Xp-Endo</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">199475</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">Endoactivador</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">199476</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="t">Odontology</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">1618-1247</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">v. 105 n. 2 (2017)</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">257190</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ART</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">(ODN)65694</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="001">266533</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">266533</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">266533</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">AR-ReUNN</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">AR-ReUNN</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">aacr2</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
